It is such a shame, all this. I had an interesting chat just now with the newsagent, Indian-born, who has been following the whole drama on Indian satellite TV as well as in the media here. He and I agreed that it is highly likely Harbhajan did call Symonds a “monkey”, though the inquiry into the incident has followed rules of evidence that are very questionable: “hearsay” rather than actual. It is also highly likely Hogg called Harbhajan a “bastard”. What we then encounter in part is a case of intercultural communication breakdown. In India the term “monkey” is not as loaded as Australians might think; oddly it is possibly analogous with the status of the word “bastard” in Australian English, where that term is not normally deeply offensive, depending on tone and context. However, here the term “monkey” applied to a black man really is racial vilification, on the ground that the message in the word is that the black man is lower down the evolutionary tree than the user of the word. That is why we hear the word applied to Symonds as “racist”. He may as well, from our point of view, have called Symonds a f*cking nigger. That is what we hear when Symonds is called a monkey. I can accept that Indian speakers/listeners may be giving and receiving a different message. Similarly, an Australian calling Harbhajan a “bastard” is not questioning the man’s parentage, though if the word is used in anger it is obviously not complimentary. On the other hand, we Australians call each other “bastards” all the time: you really are a soft bastard, but I like you…
I can quite understand the point the Indians are making about the process and subsequent verdict against Harbhajan.
Read the rest of this entry »