Daily Archives: December 29, 2007

Blogginess and such

Over on Old Lines from a Floating Life I have been doing a series to wind that blog up before it becomes merely an archive: see 2007 in Review. What is “in review” is the blog, not the world at large — so it is an exercise in “metablogging”, aka “wanking”. 😉 However, I stand by it as it does have useful features, apart from my own enjoyment. There are good lists there of posts I would like people to read, for example.

The latest metablog will amuse some of you: 2007 in review: #23 — template fickleness! I think I may have set some kind of record in the past year or so.

There are strict limits to the fiddling you are allowed to do on They do not normally allow Java scripts, for example, for (I believe) security reasons. They also limit the changes you can make to a template. I have happily wrecked quite a few templates on Blogspot, but you can’t do that on WordPress. The templates are in fact common to all the blogs which use them, so if they let me restructure something deep down that change would automatically transfer itself to all the blogs using that template. You can, apparently, buy some CSS rights, which I haven’t even though it isn’t expensive. I guess they must decouple you from the shared template then in some way.

There are things you can fiddle with, such as sidebar widgets and custom headings. You will see I do both, because when I have something to fiddle with I am sure to fiddle. One big deficiency in my expertise (among legion deficiencies) is that I have very limited graphic programs apart from what Windows XP brings with it. I don’t have Photoshop for example. However, I have found a neat free program that enables the basics plus more: Photofiltre, a little French thing that doesn’t take up much space and is easy to learn and use:

Read the rest of this entry »

1 Comment

Posted by on December 29, 2007 in blogging, site news


More on Benazir

Naturally the papers are full of events in Pakistan today. One might add that the US would have been better off in general if its attention had been more firmly on this part of the world after 9/11, and less focussed on Iraq. But that is a whole other story that goes back to the tail end of the Cold War, the rise of Al Qaeda and the Taliban, and the US contributions to both in the interests of the Great Game (1970s/80s version) in Afghanistan.

One of the more moving pieces I have read so far comes from The Australian’s Bruce Loudon:

Read the rest of this entry »


Posted by on December 29, 2007 in current affairs, events, humanity, Islam, politics, USA



Recycle 6: from 29 March 2007 on WordPress — Religion: Who Needs It?

Good heavens: this is the second reference to Jamie Stern-Weiner’s blog in two days! He has written there an entertaining account of a debate at Westminster on "‘We’d be better off without religion." Jamie agrees we would be, and admired participants in the debate such as Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and A.C. Grayling rather than their opposition, Rabbi Julia Neuberger, Prof. Nigel Spivey and the conservative philosopher Roger Scruton. I am not a Scruton fan either. It is all very hypothetical though. Religion isn’t about to go away, not in my lifetime or probably in yours. Me, I am a believer in God who does not believe in magic books. So I agree entirely about the dubious morality of much of the Bible, but not of all of the Bible, and ditto for the Quran, though here is an interesting conundrum for the world as Muslims tend to be wedded to the magic book principle even more than Christians or Jews. Rather than go into all that here, I refer you to entries here under the tag "Bible". So I do not identify with this characterisation of religion:

…Rather than a rational discussion of morality culminating in a series of arguments, religious morality is just a set of rules written down on paper, with no attempt at rational explanation and no critical discussion of the issues. Moreover, believers are positively discouraged from thinking for themselves about morality, and are rather indoctrinated or terrified into blindly following whatever their “Holy Book” or “religious teacher” has to say. That’s not morality, it’s tyrannical brainwashing…

Rather, I do lean towards this comment in Meanjin Vol. 65, no. 4, 2006:

Modern-day Christians have to stop thinking that they do not need to engage in dialogue because they have found their good shepherd. Having to engage with those of a different faith is not always comfortable. But in our post-secular society, in which the boundary between belief and unbelief is much less clear than for previous generations, interfaith dialogue is the way of the future… We are becoming a society in whch secular and religious cultures coexist, and indeed can sometimes learn from each other. In that sense we may be moving to a post-secular generation. — Constant J Mews, Monash University

In that spirit I have been compiling this section of my blog roll

To those I now add (thanks to Arthur):

I think I would also add [29 December 2007] a classic essay, written in 1938, but just as (even more?) resonant for 2008: E M Forster’s "What I Believe".

Read the rest of this entry »

Comments Off on Recycle 6: from 29 March 2007 on WordPress — Religion: Who Needs It?

Posted by on December 29, 2007 in Christianity, faith, inspiration, pluralism, religion, replays