These are the twenty top posts and pages to have been visited individually during February.
Monthly Archives: February 2008
I have already posted on the quite seriously insane idea — and I mean insane quite literally and clinically — that Obama is the Antichrist. The benefit of course has been to this (and other blogs) who mention the words Obama and Antichrist, a great recipe for increasing traffic at the moment. Malevolent, though, as well as ignorant have been the Obama is a Muslim posts and comments: not that there would be any great harm, except to his electoral chances in the USA, if Obama were a Muslim. But he isn’t.
For a bit of truth on this go to Sojourners and read the whole article: I just got the email minutes ago.
After coaching tonight I caught the slow bus from Chinatown to arrive on a cold and wet Sydney night at Newtown’s rather wonderful Courthouse Hotel for the blogger meetup. That’s not our group in the picture on the right. I was late, so I missed Marcellous.
Even before I had settled into the group for an hour I met of all people someone I had taught English with at Dapto back in 1970, one of the Spender sisters, Dale and Lynn, the former a rather well-known feminist writer, the other no slouch either. It was Lynn I saw, though initially I thought it was Dale. We both contemplated the years that had flown since then with some amazement, though I have to say I am a minnow compared with what those two have done with that time. (See also When I was a twenty-something conservative in transition…)
… but it is my belief that Michael Mansell’s views on Jenny Macklin’s handling of the Indigenous Affairs portfolio are no more worthy of consideration than my own. Objectively speaking, that is, and for a number of reasons aside from the fact my own degree of Aboriginal descent is probably much the same as his — and I am well aware what a minefield that is.
The fact is that there are no Aboriginal communities in Tasmania analogous to the communities in the remote parts of mainland Australia. There are none with the same issues. In 2002 Richard Flanagan published an article that incurred Mansell’s ire:
On an island of ironies, where leading Aboriginal activists can have fair skin and blue eyes, the question becomes more perplexing. Even to Tasmanian Aborigines, some of whom are predicting bloodshed, the answer is divisive. To the rest of the world it is just baffling, for Tasmania is still frequently – and wrongly – cited as the site of the only successful genocide in history.
On that strange, sorry island, it was said a race of indigenous people had, within 80 years of the English invasion, disappeared from the face of the earth. Glosses on their fate varied, but no doubt was had as to the fate itself. With the death of Truganini in 1876, the last of the Tasmanians was thought gone.
The dominant early view was that they had been wiped out by the colonisers. This, at least, had the honesty of acknowledging the horror of the English invasion. The Aborigines had fought back in a long war, and some, if not all, early colonists recognised their right to do so.
“Whatever the future historian of Tasmania may have to say,” wrote the 19th-century historian J.E. Calder, “he will do them an injustice if he fails to record that, as a body, they held their ground bravely for 30 years against the invaders of their beautiful domains.”
But this view dimmed as a new idea took hold in the late 19th century, backed with the ballast of the most advanced scientific thought. Nothing seemed to offer more striking proof to the late Victorian mind of the infernal truth of social Darwinism than the supposed demise of the Tasmanian Aborigines. They were an inferior race, a meek and primitive people doomed to die out, and the coming of the English, with their diseases and guns, had merely hastened the inevitable. Read the rest of this entry »
The first came my way as I was searching for information while posting this on Ninglun on Blogspot; Rob Baiton in Indonesia found that entry last night and left a comment there, while also being inspired by “Don’t say you weren’t warned” to post an entry of his own.
Generally, I try and be understanding of all, even the far Christian right, but this supposed Church is so far right that I do not think they are in cooee distance. Besides, I just do not see that rational argument is an option here. Look, how do you argue a rational point of view with a Church whose website address is www.godhatesfags.com? After all, these are the same religious zealots (I must admit other words came to mind other than zealot) that protest at the funerals of returned service men and women in the US.
Apparently, God is killing America’s young men and women in Afghanistan and Iraq as punishment for moving away from the pure teachings of God. It appears that in particular God sends down his wrath against anyone or any country that tolerates homosexuality.The above just goes to show that there is no one religion that has a monopoly on fundamentalist teachings and interpretations. Even ones that seem to cross the line to vilification and hate speech in some pundits’ books!
I found this via the news feed in Ninglun on Blogspot, sourced from Reuters India.
CANBERRA (Reuters) – An Australian school refused entry to a Sikh student on Tuesday because he was wearing a turban, saying it would not change its rules despite the threat of legal action.The family of the 12-year-old boy, who will not be named, have complained to the Anti-Discrimination Commission in Queensland state after Ormiston College ordered the boy to cut his hair and remove his turban as a condition of entry.
“The complaint is the college discriminated against the child by placing conditions on his enrolment that he was unable to comply with because of his religion,” family solicitor Scott McDougall told Australian radio.
Ormiston College is a co-educational and non-denominational school which says on its Web site that it “affirms individual differences and actively promotes cultural and intellectual understanding”.
The private school, which has almost 550 students, is on the coastal outskirts of the state capital Brisbane.
Principal Brett Webster said the school respected the boy’s religious beliefs, but would not change its rules.
“We’re certainly not asking the family or the boy to turn their back on their religion,” Webster said.
“But the question is should the school, should every organisation, change its standard policies every time somebody comes along with a different set of beliefs.”
Australia has around 50,000 Sikhs among the 21 million population.