Last night on ABC and this morning’s news…

04 Aug

… had a mix of the bizarre and the tragic. You wouldn’t read about it, would you? Hollywood couldn’t invent stuff like this.

Let’s begin with the tragic.

Terror in Mumbai (originally on UK Channel Four) was last night’s offering from Four Corners.

…Their first target was the Leopold Cafe where they killed 11 people. From there they planted bombs inside taxis as the moved across the city. Terror in Mumbai follows the young men every step of the way using telephone calls made between the raid’s masterminds in Pakistan and the gunmen in Mumbai. Those calls combine with the testimony of the captured terrorist Ajmal Kasab, to create an extra-ordinary chronology of the attacks.

The calls reveal how the young men are continually reminded they must kill as many people as possible, making sure that whatever happens they must not be taken alive.

Ajmal Kasab, speaking from his hospital bed tells how he and another man attacked the city’s train station slaughtering more than 50 people…

As the film progresses the relationship between the attackers and their controllers at the other end of the phone comes into clearer focus.

At times the young men appear utterly ruthless, at other times they break away from their conditioning and register their wonder at the hotel they have taken over. They talk of computers and expensive furniture as if in a wonderland.

As the film progresses the terrorists are told to kill as many people as they can in the Taj Hotel, and then to start a fire. The purpose? To let the world know a symbol of India and the decadent west is being destroyed.

As the phone calls continue it becomes clear the young men are not always willing to kill on command. In one chilling episode one gunman is told to kill a hostage. He stalls for time. Then an hour later he is ordered to shoot. A gunshot is heard…

It was riveting and incredibly sad. The Svengali on the other end of the phone gives new manifestation to the concept of pure evil. The psychology of the perpetrators, one of whom was “sold” — according to the program and his own testimony – to Lashkar e Toiba by his own father so that his siblings could afford to marry, reminded me so much of Joseph Conrad’s The Secret Agent. The father was a poor street yoghurt seller.

… The 10 gunmen had sneaked ashore in Mumbai around 9pm on 26 November, having sailed from Pakistan in a hijacked Indian trawler.

Less than an hour later, during a killing spree across the city which included the main railway station, four gunmen entered the luxury Taj Hotel. Young Pakistanis from villages in the Punjab, who had never set foot in a modern hotel before, let alone the vast suites on the upper floors of the Taj, they could not contain their amazement. The first few hours of intercepts at the Taj show them struggling to keep their minds on the task of burning down the hotel.

‘There are so many lights… and so many buttons. And lots of computers with 22 and 30-inch screens…’ says one.

The other chilling piece of evidence we obtained during the making of this film, was told by one of the gunmen, Kasab, who was taken alive by Indian police and his questioning recorded.

‘What’s your gang called? Your team?’ asks one policeman.

Kasab seems not to understand.

‘Your organization, your gang, your team?’, some of the other officers round the hospital bed chime in.

‘Oh… It’s Lashkar e Toiba.’ …

It is as well – again – to remind ourselves that it is not all of Islam we are looking at here, but a perversion. Jim Belshaw has also taken up that theme: For Tikno – selection, perception, bias and the MUI Fatwa. The comments from Tikno in Indonesia and Ramana in India enhance Jim’s wisdom on this. You may also listen to this: “Young Indonesians have made use of social networking sites to protest against terrorism.” The India-Pakistan situation has complicating strands of history involved – the mess of the Partition and the unsolved dilemma of Kashmir. (I studied Indian History at university and have ever since taken an interest.) Further, in relation to Ramana’s comment, there is no single body that can speak for Islam. To a degree everyone is his or her own mufti, and the result is amazing diversity. This can be good, but also complicates things terribly. The media do focus on the violent extremists, though Tikno’s point about the majority being against violent extremism is almost certainly a truer picture.

Now for the bizarre.

Malcolm Turnbull. Well, he is human, as that Australian Story episode shows, but a bit of a goose too. The show was filmed behind the scenes as the Utegate Imbroglio was occurring, and today all that became more bizarre still: I wrote fake email: Grech.

And then there is that sleazy Radio 2DayFM The Kyle and Jackie O Show. So glad I never listened to them, especially after Media Watch revealed how bottom of the barrel the show has really been.

More 10 to 17 year-olds, by far, listen to 2DayFM than to any other Sydney station.

Yet up to now ACMA has done nothing about Kyle and Jackie’s obsession with boobs and willies, their parade of vaginas and penises, their discussions of anal sex, and oral sex, and faeces-eating during sex, and other such breakfast-time delights.

And then there’s the program’s routine humiliation and emotional manipulation of its ‘guests’.

Tonight, while Austereo reviews its ‘principles and protocols’, we’re going to look at a particularly sickening example. It wasn’t about sex, or juveniles.

It was about heartless exploitation…

About as funny as a pile of dead rats.



5 responses to “Last night on ABC and this morning’s news…

  1. Kevin

    August 4, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    “It is as well – again – to remind ourselves that it is not all of Islam we are looking at here, but a perversion.”

    Are you calling the 22% of worshipers of islam that supported this attack perverts? Jeez, that’s like 200-300 million people that you’ve just named as perverted, Neil. That’s not like you to say something so politically incorrect, even when it’s obviously accurate.

    I, for one, applaud you for your honesty! But the next thing you have to realize is that it’s in fact the 78% who opposed the murders that are not in keeping with the tenets of islam. Once you’ve mastered that, political correctness will have no sway over you, and you will be free to speak the truth! It’s a great feeling that I hope you get to learn.

    Keep growing in your knowledge of islam, Neil. Read the book. Make sure that you understand ‘abrogation’. You’ll see that, like I’ve said before, “In many murderous ways, the koran is not a holy book.”

  2. Neil

    August 4, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    Kevin, I have read the book, and I have also read the Old Testament’s (or, for Jewish friends, The Tanakh’s) advocacy of genocide, collecting foreskins on the battlefield, stoning people to death, executing children for disobedience, forbidding anyone with damaged testicles from entering the temple, and so on, but our “political correctness” glosses over all that. There are a majority of Muslims who interpret their book in ways that are not threatening to the rest of us, as you seem to admit, so why don’t we and they work together on whatever causes that very dangerous minority to threaten us all.

    As you may have read, a terrorist attack on an army base in Sydney was foiled today.

    We have been down this road before, haven’t we? In the now 149 posts* on Islam I have never excused terrorism, but I have taken on board that it is a problem Muslims here and in the USA, where there is a sizeable community, and everywhere, have to work through, and I know the majority wish to do that and have been doing that, as Tikno (a Christian) tried to point out in his post on living, as he does, in the largest Muslim country in the world and our nearest neighbour. I don’t believe insisting I or you are right in the way we read the Quran is much use when clearly the majority of Muslims don’t read it that way. To that extent the minority within the minority of literalists who take to the bomb and the gun are perverted — deviating from what most of their coreligionists actually believe and practise.

    My views have nothing to do either with “political correctness” or with complacency about terrorism, but rather seem to me the most practical ways of containing the problem. The first thing is to know precisely who the enemy is. It is no more “Islam” than “Europe” or “Christiantity” were “Nazism” during WWII.

    * You don’t have to read them all: these posts are most relevant, and you might like to seriously look at what there is there from US sources, much of it in my view quite excellent.

  3. tikno

    August 5, 2009 at 4:19 am

    Neil, I found a controversial blog at:

    where the author of this blog has “claim” as Nur Din M. Top (the most wanted person). Within this blog he “claims” was responsible for the bombardment at JW Marriott. I do not know whether this blog is only a farce from the fraudulent or not. When I visit it, this blog have got comments from 2,766 people with various contumelious / condemns / anger to the author.
    Visit it before Google ban this controversial blog.

  4. Kevin

    August 5, 2009 at 11:29 am

    “There are a majority of Muslims who interpret their book in ways that are not threatening to the rest of us, as you seem to admit, so why don’t we and they work together on whatever causes that very dangerous minority to threaten us all.”

    I would say that we’ve been trying that for eight or so years (before that Americans tried nothing because we really didn’t care about islam). Clearly, current events suggest that it’s not working. I guess if you want to we could continue trying that. Maybe the outcome will be different if we just try harder! But I doubt it.

    You say, “The first thing is to know precisely who the enemy is. It is no more “Islam” than “Europe” or “Christiantity” were “Nazism” during WWII.”

    Nazism and Bushido were the enemies. Not the Japanese or the Germans. The ideology was the killer. So what did the allies do? Destroyed both ideologies utterly. I hope you’ll agree that the world, including Germany and Japan, are better off since we destroyed those abominable and deadly ideologies. islam is just another one of those that must go.

    Aside: Nice try saying that the Old Testament preaches the same murderous view as the koran! Sadly, you are mistaken. The Old Testament merely reports on some deadly and inhumane killings. The koran leaves standing orders to carry out deadly and inhumane killings for eternity. That’s quite a difference!

    I’ll stop commenting on this thread because I know you want islam to be just another non-murderous religion, and I don’t want to burst your bubble. Have a great week!

  5. Neil

    August 5, 2009 at 11:41 am

    I will leave it to experts to respond, if they will. My views are not eccentric, Kevin, far from it. Even John Howard was not far off from what I have been saying.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: