1. A feast for pollie-watchers and pundits
Just look at The Australian today.
David Uren THE Coalition faces an electoral wipeout at next year’s federal election if the rebels led by Tony Abbott and Nick Minchin succeed in blocking the government’s climate change legislation.
- SPILL: Abbott favourite to wrest leadership
- ELECTION: ETS looms as a poll trigger
- LEADER: Turnbull unmoved as support dives
- HOCKEY: Joe’s time may come too soon
- PAUL KELLY: Rebels with a lost cause
- DENNIS SHANAHAN: Political soap opera
- MICHAEL STUTCHBURY: Carbon bubble punctured
- PETER VAN ONSELEN: Product differentiation
The lead story’s interesting, and so is Paul Kelly. I suspect Joe Hockey is privately fuming.
2. Borrowed from Jim Belshaw
Like Jim, I won’t comment!
I simply report this gem from the Australian Citizens Electoral Council without comment.
Isherwood: Who would have thought? British genocidalists are liars too
The British oligarchy’s depopulation charity, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), established in 1961 by Prince Philip and “former” Nazi Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands to realise their wet dream of reducing the world’s population to two billion or so people, is a key paymaster of the lying scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU).
The CRU basically cooked up the whole global warming fraud: in another time, before hackers exposed their true nature last week, Britain’s former chief scientific adviser Sir David King happily gushed that the CRU “set the agenda for the major research effort” in climate change; its “scientists” are the leading authors of the IPCC reports cited as the bible on global warming.
3. Why Steve Fielding is a much nicer person than Nick Minchin
Senator Fielding (Family First) has copped much flack for his denial of anthropogenic climate change, but at least he is up front about it, even trotting out his charts to try to convince the green demonstrators outside Parliament the other day. Of course, as we all know, Fielding isn’t really a politician. Minchin is.
So now Minchin is a double denialist because 1) he denies that what he is doing goes way beyond the issue of the ETS and 2) he attempts to deny he is a denialist. On both counts he is being economical with the truth. On point 2 he has been on record for years and one wonders why – well, not really – he is figleafing himself today. Of Minchin climate scientist Graeme Pearman famously said in March 2007: "I am worried that a federal minister would believe this crap."
4. And Malcolm Turnbull is much nicer than Nick Minchin…
While not totally frank Malcolm Turnbull was considerably more accurate than Senator Minchin in his half of the back-to-back interviews on the 7.30 Report last night. On just one obvious point, as Paul Kelly says: “The conservative rebellion this week has been a stunning, ruthless and self-righteous exercise. It was about converting a minority into a majority position by sabotage. Don’t fall for the idea that Turnbull didn’t have majority support.”
5. Science marches on whatever the pollies do or say
The first-ever Australian benchmark of climate change impacts on marine ecosystems and options for adaptation is being released in Brisbane today.
27 November 2009
The Marine Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Report Card for Australia, and an accompanying website, will provide a biennial guide for scientists, government and the community on observed and projected impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems.
"The objective of compiling this information is to consider options available to environmental and resource managers in their response to changes in ecosystem balance," says project leader, CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship scientist Dr Elvira Poloczanska.
"On both sides of the continent there is clear evidence of ocean warming and this is already bringing sub-tropical species south into temperate waters, and in the case of the giant kelp forests in Tasmania, appears to be having a severe impact in just a few years.
"This research is relevant for anyone with a recreational interest or financial investment in our coasts and oceans," Dr Poloczanska says.
6. If you want to read a book
Try Robert Henson, The Rough Guide to Climate Change 2 ed.
I like it because I can understand it, but also because it is less polemical than many in the field. He admits problems and complexities.